And yes, some people genuinely think an alien invasion is happening right now.
And I’d be up for it, I think – end the year with a bang. A history making, paradigm shifting bang.
But no, alas, my thoughts don’t let me get carried away on the tempting wave of excitement. I sometimes hate myself for that. I should learn to let go more.
I did note a week ago, as I have previously, that high-profile ‘UAP’ incidents and mysterious phenomena tend to follow or coincide with major governmental discussion of the subject in the public domain. And this last week, it has occurred in abundance.
Last time, the ambiguous ‘Las Vegas Alien’ incident, for example, happened to coincide with the UFO report in the Senate: and just happened to be majorly covered in US media – despite such stories typically not garnering mainstream news coverage.
Likewise the highly publicised display of the supposed bodies of ancient alien beings (debunked) in Mexico’s Congress coincided with NASA’s press conference announcing their conclusions concerning ETs.
Are these just coincidence?
Well, within a week of this latest Congressional Hearing on UAPs and the possibility of non-human technologies in the skies, suddenly UAP stories have been cropping up all over the place, including in mainstream news.
I covered the content, implications and curiosities of the November 13th Congressional Hearing here last week: including the references to crash retrievals and non-human origins of unidentified aerial phenomena.
And then suddenly, UAPs, mystery ‘orbs’ or unknown ‘drones’ were everywhere.
Across the UK, at a commercial airport, at military bases, and across the Atlantic in New York, New Jersey and elsewhere, and in Washington DC itself… and those are just the most prominent examples from the past week or so.
Everywhere, people were seemingly spotting or filming UFOs: and, more curiously, mainstream media outlets were reporting on mysterious objects of indeterminate origin.
We’ll take a glance at some of these incidents – the Washington DC one is especially interesting, but we’ll get to that one at the end.
There’s also been online chatter about some major event happening (a ‘UFO War’, according to some overzealous types) on December 3rd.
That’s how excitable things have gotten.
The prediction about December 3rd, by the way, appears to be backed up by essentially nothing – so let’s not bother with that.
Here’s some amateur video from the North East of England last week. And below that a flyby video of an orb captured in New York from around the same time. And then an NBC news item about the FBI investigating mysterious lights in the sky in New Jersey. All from the last few days.
But let’s start with the UK.
Here in the UK, major news reports broke about mystery ‘drones’ appearing over airbases in Britain and being considered a national security threat.
Talk quickly turned to Russia being responsible – with no proof of this being offered.
More specifically, the ‘drones’ were reported at American airbases in the UK – a significant distinction that we will circle back to.
I’ve been putting the word ‘drones’ in inverted commas because, although this was the term being primarily used in mainstream coverage, no real evidence was provided to demonstrate this specification.
One or two mainstream commentators did use the term ‘UAPs’ in respect to the UK incidents.
As Air & Space Forces Magazine reported; ‘USAFE first reported the small drones operating around and over RAF Lakenheath, RAF Mildenhall, and RAF Feltwell on Nov. 25. Varying numbers of drones, in different sizes and configurations, were seen from Nov. 20-24. Who owns and operates the drones and what they are doing remains a mystery…’
Here’s a BBC item from November 23rd.
But garnering just as much attention, both in major media and especially online, was the supposed UAP pictured at Manchester Airport.
These stories all broke out at the same time.
The Manchester Airport image (and very brief video) was supposedly captured by an airline pilot and shows a strange ball-shaped blueish object on the ground in the airport runway.
The object looks too small to be a craft: but could potentially be some sort of probe or other piece of tech.
The extremely short video appears to show the same object shooting up into the sky.
People online have debated both the images’ authenticity and the nature of what it claims to show. Several newspapers ran pieces with an expert saying the Manchester item was ‘definitely a UFO’.
Curiously, the poster of the footage deleted his X account after sharing the content. It’s unclear why.
There’s no evidence this person was an actual pilot, as he or she remains anonymous. There’s also no evidence he or she is the original source of the footage.
The Manchester Airport ‘orb’, at least to me, seems fake.
The shot of the object in the sky is admittedly interesting: but why is the footage so short? If you were filming such an interesting thing, wouldn’t you record a little longer?
Meanwhile, the image of the object on the ground could be almost anything: including potentially a doctored photo with the object inserted in digitally.
And doesn’t the airport have its own surveillance footage? Where’s that? And was no security incident or safety concern recorded in official reports or logs?
Or has that been covered up?
Furthermore, it turns out that the Manchester Airport image is actually from June.
Which means this imagery was deliberately only published online several months later – and in a moment that just happened to coincide with the ‘drones’ stories in the news and on the heels of the UAP Congressional Hearing.
That’s a bit suspect, isn’t it?
I won’t dismiss the Manchester Airport images out of hand: as I said, the very short video of an object in the air is more convincing than the picture of the blue object on the ground.
Concerning these ‘drones’ over UK airbases, the authorities and the media have both been decidedly inconclusive about the matter.
They seem happy to classify these objects and events as a mystery.
Why?
If they’re drones in the commercially available or hobbyist sense, then why not say that? And why would they pose such a problem? Could they not be intercepted?
Could they not be tracked, followed back to their point of origin?
How could we not simply track or trace the drones? Are these ‘drones’ so advanced that we can’t examine, track or identify them?
If they were Russian or some other foreign surveillance, shouldn’t we be able to identify that more easily? And if they were Russian drones, why would the Russians be so visible and obvious about spying on us?
If these objects were being considered a security threat – which was the implication, especially if they were at US airbases in the UK – then why would we be shrugging our shoulders and simply labelling it a mystery?
We know in fact that jets were scrambled in some instances: and British troops were deployed to the bases. So these incidents were clearly considered a security threat.
It’s all very, very odd.
If these were commercially available drones being flown over the bases, then that’s illegal – and you’d expect them to be traced and someone to be arrested.
And if it was Russian or Chinese spy tech, you’d expect the authorities to declare that to be the suspicion: after all, we’re rarely hesitant when it comes to blaming Russia for things.
Furthermore, no real footage or evidence has been provided by authorities showing these alleged drones over airbases.
The footage that has been shown is from amateurs and local observers, as with this example above: so I do believe that anomalous or unknown objects were around the airspace in question, because footage exists.
But why didn’t the airbases or other authorities release anything?
Images that accompanied the reports in mainstream news outlets were, somewhat dishonestly, just random images of drones, mostly commercially available ones. They were not actual photos of the specific objects claimed to have been seen at the airbases.
Also the fact that these were specifically US airbases in the UK is curious too: implying that these objects weren’t just appearing at random sites, but American sites specifically.
Which, one would infer, rules out ‘aliens’ or any more exotic sources. Maybe it could be Russian or some other foreign tech.
But the fact that these were American airbases raises another possibility. And this ties back to something that happened a year ago in the US.
And this is the mystery of the unknown objects that were apparently hovering around the Langley Air Force base for some seventeen days. Although this unresolved series of events actually occurred late last year, it was being talked about by various news outlets a few weeks ago.
This piece from October explains, for example: ‘Top security officials in the U.S. remain stumped after an unknown fleet of drones breached restricted military airspace for 17 straight days last December… A new report, first detailed by the Wall Street Journal, says military personnel reported witnessing the mysterious fleet over a stretch of land at Langley Air Force Base along Virginia’s shore. The drones would appear in the sky about 45 minutes to an hour after sunset each night…‘
With these objects over the Air Force base, it’s odd to me that the military and the government were being so open about apparently not knowing what these things were or where they were from. In the old days, they would’ve simply put out a cover story to kill speculation: they wouldn’t have left it purposefully mysterious.
So are they just being incredibly honest? Or are they wilfully trying to encourage speculation and continue to nurture the idea that there’s unknown aerial tech out there from unknown sources?
Again, all of this strangely open and ambiguous public discourse – along with the various hearings, committees and ‘disclosures’ concerning ‘UAPs’ that seem to be happening every few months now – is a huge shift away from how this subject used to be handled.
None of the media reports on this subject that I’ve read have even suggested the possibility of the drones originating from the base itself. Even though that’s the most obvious explanation.
But these ‘drones’ mysteriously appearing around US airbases in the UK last week definitely seem to echo the Langley Airbase incidents.
In both cases, it happened at airbases.
In both cases, ‘drones’ of unknown origin were cited.
In both cases, the matter was left a ‘mystery’.
In both cases, nothing was done to intercept or even track these objects, even though they would be considered a security threat.
Isn’t the most logical explanation that, in both cases, the drones originated from the US airbases themselves and were some kind of new or experimental tech being flown around – and that the subsequent ‘mystery’ and speculation is all a manufactured guessing game?
That’s be my best guess anyway.
Which doesn’t necessarily explain away all of the various incidents that have been doing the rounds – but it would account for the activity around the airbases specifically.
I’m not pretending to be definitive here – but it’s suspicious that we’re being so encouraged to regard these airbase incidents as unresolved ‘mysteries’.
Especially after all the talk of unknown-origin tech violating US airspace, as discussed during the Washington DC hearings.
And I think it makes more sense than what some people are currently suggesting – which is that extra-terrestrials are suddenly appearing all over the place in order to prevent impending nuclear warfare on earth.
I mean, okay, there’s some precedent there at least: there’s a documented history of UFOs appearing at nuclear sites (which we covered during this older article) – which, strangely, received far less coverage back then than these current airbase drones have gotten.
But these latest incidents haven’t involved any known nuclear sites. And I don’t know how putting on a light show is meant to avert nuclear war anyway: unless the implication is that these appearances, especially at airbases, are meant as some kind of sign, threat or warning to governments (and not aimed at the general public) to de-escalate.
Which is possible, I suppose… but seems less likely.
And again, why does this stuff always amplify and multiply when there’s just been a high-profile ‘UAP’ hearing in Congress or some similar ‘disclosure’ type event where these subjects are being discussed?
Speaking of Washington DC, there was also an alleged UFO incident in the vicinity of the US Capitol in recent days.
As the Economic Times relayed: ‘… The viral photo, shared widely on social media, appears to show bright lights hovering in the night sky above the Capitol building. A video, taken from a different angle, further amplified the discussion. The video shows the lights seemingly materialising in the sky, sparking widespread panic among social media users. This has led many to ask how such bright lights could have appeared without explanation.’
This one seems to have been debunked as light reflections. But I think the jury’s still out.
But it’s curious that an erstwhile UFO sighting involved (or was manufactured at) the US Capitol – because it seems to echo the infamous Washington DC UFO invasion of 1952, in which well-documented mysterious objects invaded not just DC itself, but even appeared over the Capitol building.
We talked about that 1952 incident in this in-depth article exploring the entire UFO subject more broadly.
Was this latest DC thing an attempt to evoke that decades old piece of UFO lore?
Of course, with the Congressional Hearing also just having happened in Washington, having a new UFO incident occur right there in the vicinity makes sense too.
It’s all a bit too well-timed and coordinated, is what I’m saying.
Amid all these latest incidents, reports and sightings, I wouldn’t be surprised if one or two of them have been genuine anomalies of unknown origin. Because I’m actually not a sceptic when it comes to this stuff.
But most of it, I would wager, has been a coordinated light show for public consumption.
As I wrote last week, I suspect we are being slow-walked towards prefabricated scenarios and outcomes – a bit at a time.
If pushed, I would conclude the Manchester Airport thing is a fake.
And the ‘mystery drones’, I suspect, are new tech being flown about – possibly even to be deliberately confused for ‘UAPs’.
Some of the other stuff is more difficult to gage.
But again, there’s lots more engaging and even convincing footage or eyewitness accounts of anomalous aerial activity that exists – some of it contemporary, a lot of it from over the last several decades.
And some of which is much more suggestive of exotic or otherworldly connections.
But that’s seemingly never the stuff that makes it onto the news or gets discussed in official settings.
Instead we get things like this mostly unconvincing Manchester Airport image or the ‘mystery’ drones over airbases.
Something’s definitely going on right now – let’s acknowledge that much.
But is it a genuine ‘mystery’? A real threat? Or is it manufactured, choreographed theater for public consumption?
Isn’t the most logical explanation that, in both cases, the drones originated from the US airbases themselves and were some kind of new or experimental tech being flown around – and that the subsequent ‘mystery’ and speculation is all a manufactured guessing game?
That’s be my best guess anyway.
Mine too. I think you nailed it!
I’ve probably said this before but my biigest issue with UFOs (besides the way they always seem to appear above or near to military bases) is that they are invariably lit up like Christmas trees. I mean these alien craft would have had to have travelled god knows how light years through the impenetrable darkness of deep space where there’s nothing worth illuminating in the first place, and then instead of maintaining the same stealth they suddenly slap on the headlights. Does that mean they desperately want to be seen? Certainly seems like it, But in that case, then why not just turn up properly like the Europeans did when we landed in America and Australia and announce themselves fully to the natives? I have other issues with aliens that relate simply to the extreme distances involved and the sheer remoteness of our little blue dot. But lights in the sky… that simply makes no sense to me anymore.
Thanks for commenting. That’s something id never thought about, regarding the lights. Maybe they want to be seen? I know in some cases, the idea is that the very substance they’re made from is light emitting? But that doesn’t really work for these current sightings and incidents, which seem to be more functional lights.
You assume those ‘stars’ are light years away. Have you ever looked into how they make these calculations? I suggest you do because this is how they create the narratives they need to pull off the ultimate deceptions.
As Plato (they love him, by the way) purportedly states – ‘He who writes the stories, controls society.’
I suggest those lights are closer to us than you think. However, the notion of alien life is fundamental to the agenda, so I also question the true nature of stars.