So. Even though the news agenda has moved on already, it’s worth taking the time to cast our minds back a couple of weeks.
Because 2025 began with some highly incendiary and dubious incidents. And the media focus seems to want to brush them under the carpet already.
Three events in particular should be discussed: the vehicle-based Christmas market terror attack in Germany, the Tesla cybertruck attack in Las Vegas, and the supposed ISIS-inspired attack in New Orleans – the latter two occurring on the same day.
They all seemed to occur very close together, with the two US-based incidents seeming especially linked – though investigators have dismissed the idea of the events being connected.
Let’s start with the two US incidents: and then circle back to Magdeburg.
Firstly, the deadly vehicle attack in New Orleans seemed to mimic or echo the German Christmas market attack from a week or so earlier.
News items have claimed the New Orleans suspect was in fact researching the German attack prior to the New Year’s Eve attack in New Orleans.
Bizarrely, the named perpetrator – Shamsud-Din Jabbar – just happened to be from a military background and linked to Fort Bragg: as was the cybertruck attacker Matthew Livelsberger, who carried out his operation in Vegas that same day.
In fact, there have been suggestions that the two men knew each other: either from Fort Bragg or from having both served in Afghanistan in 2009.
Despite this glaring link, the mainstream discourse continued to present the two attacks as unrelated: one being a supposed Islamist act of terror, the other being something less straightforward.
We’ll come back to the Fort Bragg aspect in a little while.
But with the New Orleans attack, there appeared to be no meaningful link to the Islamic State group that we were informed of: though it was claimed that Jabbar was carrying an Islamic State flag during his attack and had supposedly recorded videos announcing his loyalty to ISIS.
For all of that, the man in question doesn’t fit the profile of an ISIS enthusiast or a terrorist. Shamsud-Din Jabbar was US-born, raised Christian initially, served in the US military, and was an educated and highly qualified professional.
Moreover, according to multiple reports, he was unknown to Muslim communities in his areas of residence and had never attended any nearby mosques or community centers.
In a bizarre and too-conveniently-timed item, an apparent news reporter presented a report directly from inside the alleged terrorist’s house. Dressed a little strangely for a news correspondent, she casually wandered through what should’ve been a cordoned off location, examining his belongings and providing a running commentary to camera.
Occurring less than twenty-four hours after the attack, the whole item was ridiculous. Police are nowhere to be seen. This reporter somehow got unfettered access to what should’ve been a location of active police and forensics investigation, and clearly contrived objects are arranged to be ‘found’ by the reporter.
In one of the silliest bits, a conveniently open copy of the Koran is found on display.
The entire thing looks completely staged. You can examine the video for yourself and probably list two dozen more things that are wrong with this news item.
Again, Jabbar at one time served at Fort Bragg. Keep that in mind.
As for the cybertruck attack at the Trump hotel, the fact that the supposed ‘suicide bomber’ Matthew Livelsberger was also linked to Fort Bragg is conspicuous enough on its own to suggest conspiracy.
Not only that, but he was an active special forces officer: and 18 of his 19 years of military service were in special forces. Livelsberger’s Uncle even referred to him as a ‘supersoldier’.
The lone wolf notion is highly questionable.
Livelsberger – or at least the burnt corpse officially identified as Livelsberger – supposedly shot himself in the head prior to his explosive-filled Tesla vehicle hitting the Trump hotel.
As per the by-now common meme, his ID documents and passport were discovered intact in the vehicle, undamaged by the fire.
The fact that this one attack managed to palpably link or evoke both the incoming President Trump (it was a Trump hotel) and the psy-op man of the moment Elon Musk (it was a Tesla vehicle) also can’t be coincidence.
The true motive for this attack, however, remains ambiguous. And there are contradictions in the narrative.
FBI statements, for example, portrayed Livelsberger as essentially a right-wing MAGA type, with his manifesto ticking every box for right-wing talking points: pro Trump, an Elon fan, hatred of the Democrats, animosity towards Kamala Harris, etc.
Like the Jabbar story, it seemed a little too neat and prefabricated: though his relatives also seemed to paint a similar picture, suggesting a highly patriotic figure and a Trump loyalist.
But a lot was made of an interview on the Shawn Ryan YouTube channel, in which guest with a special forces background (Sam Shoemate) presented correspondence he allegedly had received from Livelsberger prior to the incident.
The claim was that the cybertruck attacker did this to draw attention to revelations that he wanted to reveal to the public. Specifically that the mystery drones that have been all over the place in recent months are in fact Chinese in origin and an active threat to US security.
The email also talks, among other things, that about the Iranian threat on US soil, anti-gravity technology being used by both the US and China, and war crimes committed by the US in Afghanistan.
Crucially, Shoemate’s claim is that Livelsberger was not the corpse found in the cybertruck – and that the special forces officer had in fact been attempting to flee to Mexico.
A hell of a lot of people seemed to think Shoemate and the correspondence were genuine.
Was it?
It’s hard to say. Some of it seems convincing: especially certain technical details.
However, setting up China and Iran as an active and serious threat on American soil seemed very conveniently tailored to suit the incoming Trump/Elon administration.
More importantly, both Shoemate and the host Shawn Ryan are from military or intelligence backgrounds – and are therefore not to be taken at face value at any time.
Let’s be frank: anyone identified as an ‘ex intelligence officer’ or something similar is not to be trusted, no matter how they’ve chosen to rebrand themselves. And Shawn Ryan is an ex Navy Seal.
Still, the podcast got so much traction that it was even referred to in an official briefing by law enforcement. If interested, you can watch the interview here.
The cybertruck attack remains ambiguous and unresolved.
But the fact that both Livelsberger and Jabbar can be linked to Fort Bragg surely remains entirely relevant.
So let’s talk about Fort Bragg.
Fort Bragg is notorious for its Psy-Ops operations.
In fact, I covered Fort Bragg a lot during this in-depth piece about the 2020 US Election and the January 6th Capitol Riot.
Among other things, we examined how a Fort Bragg ‘Psy-Ops officer’, Captain Emily Rainey, was involved in the January 6th chaos at the Capitol.
We also examined how Fort Bragg was probably behind the now-forgotten Nashville truck bomb incident just prior to January 6th – and how that faltering op was linked to a hypothetical coup operation at the intended climax of the QAnon Psy-Op (I.e: January 6th).
I don’t want to go over all of those details again here, as that was a complex article: you can read it here.
The point is that Fort Bragg specifically is known to be both infested with extreme right-wing elements and is renowned as a major Psy-Op center.
This is where the US Army Special Forces (the Green Berets) and the Joint Special Operations Command are headquartered. This includes the Delta Force, SEAL Team Six, the Intelligence Support Activity, and draws upon other units such as the US Army Rangers and the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment (the “Night Stalkers”).
I also pointed out, for example, that President Trump had made an ‘off the books’ visit to Fort Bragg just prior to the events of January 6th 2020 – which I argued was possibly to set in motion a potential coup scenario.
Putting those speculations aside, the fact then that both the New Orleans and Las Vegas attackers both have links to Fort Bragg and their supposedly unconnected attacks occurred on the same day can’t be overlooked.
Reportedly, the two men also used the same vehicle rental app for their respective attacks.
To continue to suggest the two attacks are unrelated seems pretty stupid at this point.
It appears then that Psy-Op season is wide open. And the fact that these attacks occurred on New Year’s Day are probably a bad omen for the year ahead.
Whether the purpose of this was to negatively impact the upcoming inauguration of President Trump or actually to positively empower the new POTUS isn’t clear.
But, given how helpful the July 13th assassination hoax was to the Trump movement – and given how the entire US media and political establishment went along with that psy-op – I would tentatively suggest these latest events were designed to aid the incoming administration.
The Trump programme thrives in an atmosphere of perceived danger and chaos – or “American carnage”, as Trump himself once put it.
Because that ‘carnage’ is what people think Trump the Strongman needs to come in to fix.
Supposed Islamist terror on US soil and a suicide attack on a Trump building created a perfect climate to precede Trump’s imminent inauguration.
And just to touch on the Germany attack of December 21st, it’s worth noting that this seemed to be an evocation or copycat of a similar vehicle attack in Berlin in 2016, which also happened to be on a Christmas market.
As I wrote way back then, the original Christmas market attack just happened to occur on the day that the then incoming Trump administration had held a ‘secret meeting’ with the Israeli Mossad.
Trump at the time had been heavily campaigning on anti Muslim rhetoric and he lapped up the perceived attack on Christmas.
So we have two Christmas market attacks in Germany – several years apart, but both occurring in the approach to two respective Trump inaugurations.
This one could be a coincidence. But, given that the New Orleans attack seemed to also mirror the latest German incident, it wouldn’t be overly outlandish to connect it to the two US-based incidents.
Moreover, the alleged cybertruck attacker Matt Livelsberger was actually stationed in Germany – he was only in the US for a brief visit, during which he happened to allegedly drive a Tesla vehicle into the Trump hotel.
Notwithstanding the virulent misinformation warfare following the Magdeburg attack, German authorities have insisted the Saudi-born attacker was in fact a known Islamophobe whose fully documented history attests to right-wing beliefs, pro Israel posts, and fanatical support for the likes of Trump, the AfD, Elon Musk, and Dutch Zionist Geert Wilders.
He was even reportedly trying to establish a relationship with UK-based Israeli asset and far-right Messiah ‘Tommy Robinson‘.
This being at roughly the same time that Musk was championing ‘Tommy’ as the ideal leader of the UK Reform Party. And Musk was heavily pushing the narrative on ‘X’ that Magdeburg was an ‘Islamist attack’.
Despite the information released by the German authorities, Musk persisted: and decided that Taleb Al-Abdulmohsen was actually a secret Islamist posing as a zealous Islamophobe. You know, because that’s what these devious Muslims do.
There were claims that Musk also doctored Taleb Al-Abdulmohsen’s ‘X’ posts to try to obscure the attackers far-right beliefs.
At any rate, Elon Musk seems to loom over these events like the real-world Lex Luthor he seems to have become.
No one has yet questioned Musk on his curious role in the US election, by the way – particularly his unexplained foreknowledge of vote-count results.
The Magdeburg attack is confusing: but if the 2016 Berlin Christmas market attack was being deliberately evoked, then some link to both Israel and the incoming US administration isn’t entirely far-fetched.
If Taleb Al-Abdulmohsen genuinely was an extreme right-wing enthusiast with a pro-Zionist philosophy, it’s also conceivable he might’ve been used as a tool to act out an apparent ‘Islamist attack’ in order to reinforce anti-Muslim sentiment in Europe and to also aid the AfD in the imminent German elections.
It’s worth also noting that German authorities were reportedly warned three times about Abdulmohsen, but didn’t act on it.
The Saudi born doctor and psychiatrist, in his fifties, doesn’t fit the mold of an Islamist attacker – just as New Orleans attacker Shamsud-Din Jabbar doesn’t either.
There is certainly a case to be made to link these three attacks together.
In any case, a rebooting of the commonplace terror incidents (or what I labelled at the time as the terror ‘psy-opera’) that were happening in around 2015 – 2017 seems entirely possible at this time.
Talk has already turned in the media to the possible revival of the Islamic State group in Syria and beyond: which might also be forecasting a reboot of the false-flag wave.
And I even find it curious that the BBC started the year airing a prime-time series on the 7/7 London Bombings: as if carefully re-establishing a desired paradigm (albeit one based on a total false-flag bullshit operation).
Certainly, 2025 already looks set to be a year of ‘Psy-Ops’. Enjoy.
