Islamist gunmen opening fire on exclusively Jewish targets on a Sydney beach on the first day of Hanukkah.
It’s hard to even have the motivation to try to deconstruct these things anymore, but the mass shooting at Sydney’s Bondi beach (during a Hanukkah celebration) can probably be said to bear the hallmarks of more manufactured theater.
Video footage indicates the shooters were real (and therefore that the victims were likewise real). Let’s assume that to be the case: there’s 11 minutes of video seeming to match the official narrative.
I don’t think the video shows who or what is being shot at, only the shooters. But again, I’ve refrained from quibbling with the official account. And needless to say, innocent people being shot is absolutely evil.
Aside from the fact that these antisemitic terror attacks are being set up so far in advance in the open rhetoric by certain leaders, there are a couple of interesting coincidences here too.
One is the FBI announcement about a foiled ‘pro Palestinian’ terrorist plot in L.A – clearly meant to coincide with the Sydney shooting. We’ll come back to that.
By the way, I predicted back when the Washington DC shooting happened that ‘Free Palestine’ or Palestine-themed terror attacks were going to be the new fashion trend in the world of staged attacks.
The other coincidence, though maybe less relevant here, is that arrests pertaining to what was described explicitly as ‘Satanic pedophiles’ were just made in Sydney too. Those arrests were implied to relate to an international network.
I’m not suggesting at all that that story relates to the Bondi beach shooting: just that the timing of this beach attack in the same city helpfully pushes that first story out of everyone’s focus.
But concerning the foreshadowing, such an attack as Bondi beach was clearly telegraphed by Benjamin Netanyahu – as a punishment for Australia’s government recognising Palestinian statehood.
Netanyahu had literally predicted such an incident. Fittingly enough, an August article in The Guardian was titled ‘There are risks in Australia’s row with Israel, but it’s Netanyahu who is trashing the relationship‘.
The Israeli leader complained Australia’s government was helping “those who menace Australian Jews” and encouraging “the Jew-hatred now stalking your streets”. This was in response to the recognition of a Palestinian state.
Netanyahu went even further and accused the Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese of having “betrayed Israel” and “abandoned” Australia’s Jewish community. This was months ago.
In its aftermath of this Sydney attack, he and others have of course reiterated the point and treated Bondi beach as an I-told-you-so. They did the same thing with the recent Manchester synagogue incident, which was also on the heels of Britain threatening to recognise a Palestinian state.
That Manchester attack was also conveniently on Yom Kippur, with this one now being Hanukkah.
The attack was purely because of rampant anti-Semitism, they say: antisemitism that has been created purely by the Australian leadership and other governments daring to speak of Palestinian statehood or daring to criticise Israel’s actions in Gaza.
The New York Times in fact just published an article reinforcing the precise same propaganda in the wake of Bondi beach.
Criticism of Israel or Zionism, in other words, is to blame for these attacks.
None of which makes any sense. Why would increased recognition of Palestinian statehood or of Israeli war excesses create *more* terror attacks? Wouldn’t it mean less attacks because the PR war is actually being won by the other side?
Anyway, the message is clear: stop criticising Israel and stop sympathising with the Palestinians – or more Jews will be killed overseas and their blood will be in your hands.
Israel using terror attacks as punishment on foreign soil isn’t new: we’ve previously discussed the Christchurch massacre in New Zealand and the 2015 Paris attacks in that context. In both those cases, Netanyahu had openly threatened those respective governments of New Zealand and France because they’d hinted at recognising Palestine.
And of course more recently were the highly questionable Manchester, Colorado and Washington DC incidents.
Weirdly, this particular attack may have backfired slightly because the widely lauded man who attacked and disarmed one of the shooters happened to be Muslim – thus somewhat undermining the desired narrative.
While the bystander’s intervention itself looked a little staged (again, as with the overall incident, I’m just assuming it was all real though: in as much as there being real shooters at least), what’s revealing is Zionist shills on social media scrambling to suggest that Ahmed al-Ahmed is actually a pro-Israeli Maronite Christian and not a Muslim. Some MAGA influencers were also desperate to claim he’s a Coptic Christian from Lebanon.
But, no, the man in question has been identified as a Muslim immigrant from Syria. In fact, they say he was from Idlib: which is actually a bit curious, given Idlib’s key role as a major rebel stronghold in the War in Syria.
It feels a bit odd that a migrant from Idlib province happened to be at a Hanukkah celebration in Sydney. But, you know what – let’s just accept it’s a busy, popular beach that attracts many, diverse visitors.
If, as shown, this man did single-handedly tackle and disarm a gunman, I don’t want to use this space to detract from his heroics. And again, the fact that he is from a Muslim background would actually seem to undermine the desired propaganda gains of this incident.
Questions are being asked abut how long it took police to confront the gunmen.
Meanwhile, seemingly timed to coincide with the Bondi beach incident, the FBI has just announced it foiled a major terror plot in L.A: organised by – yeah, you guessed it – a ‘pro Palestinian’ group.
As the BBC reports, ‘Four alleged members of the Turtle Island Liberation Front – an offshoot of a pro-Palestinian anti-government group – have been arrested on suspicion of planning a coordinated bombing attack in at least five locations across southern California, the FBI and LA law enforcement said on Monday...’
We’ve no way of knowing if this plot was real or if it was just made up by the FBI. The supposed group being implicated seems somewhat ambiguous. And the timing of the FBI announcement seems coordinated with what happened in Sydney.
The Bondi beach attack is also being credited to the Islamic State group: again, whether this is true or not is hard to know, but it follows the ISIS attack on US personnel in Syria a few days ago. The IS group hasn’t claimed any responsibility as of yet.
ISIS targeting Jewish people in Australia is by no means inconceivable, but the rebels or jihadist groups in the Syrian conflict haven’t previously shown any interest in attacking Israel or being pro Palestinian. The new Syrian leadership has in fact been largely pro Israel, and Israeli support was crucial in last year’s toppling of the Assad government.
And again, it’s even stranger that the brave soul who confronted one of the supposedly ISIS-aligned gunmen happened to be from the rebel stronghold of Idlib. According to reports though, he came to Australia in 2006, several years before the Syrian conflict started.
At any rate, the primary point here is that Netanyahu and co telegraphed this attack way in advance. And more of these incidents are presumably coming.
The only beneficiary is Israel and its increasingly desperate narrative. The main objectives of Bondi beach were clearly to threaten the Australian government, and simultaneously to reassert the narrative of primarily Jewish victimhood over the narrative of Palestinian victimhood.
Additionally, one assumes the idea is to continue reigniting the ‘clash of civilisations’ pantomime that’s being played out right now in multiple countries.
Israel has been severely losing the propaganda war and its leaders are desperate. But less people are having the wool pulled over their eyes these days.
That won’t stop this event from being thoroughly weaponised by those who seek benefit from it though.
All very interesting. I was especially surprised to see the link to The Independent story regarding the international Satanic Abuse ring. I thought it was all just a big Satanic Panic. So I wonder how did that particular story manage to pass under the radar?
Anyway, thanks for the reliable and prompt download of salient info – these days you are always my primary go-to source whenever there’s any whiff of false flag in the air.