Daniel Abed Khalife

The case of escaped prisoner Daniel Abed Khalife, who has now been captured again, is beginning to strike me as curious.

And not for the reasons everyone else thinks, which is his being able to escape Wandsworth Prison in a very quaint fashion and evading capture for several days.

At first, I wasn’t paying much attention to this story: even though the British media made it the primary news story for multiple days. It was only when I started trying to look into his background – in particular, the crimes he is said to be in prison for in the first place – that I started to wonder what we haven’t been told about this case and whether there’s more to this oddity than meets the eye.

While the major media was entirely focused on either the manhunt or the alleged details of his escape plan, much less coverage has looked at why he was in prison.

Well, here’s what’s curious.

Firstly, the former British army soldier, who has been referred to frequently as either a terrorist or ‘terror suspect’, hasn’t necessarily been found guilty yet. His trial isn’t happening until November.

But the part that really caught my attention is that Khalife’s initial arrest was actually on suspicion of breaching the Official Secrets Act. He was given bail and allowed to go back to his army base: but was later also charged in relation to terrorism.

Of the two alleged terrorism incidents, one was apparently in August 2021 (interestingly, at the same time he was apparently arrested in relation to the Official Secrets Act), and the other in January 2023.

As for the terror charges specifically, as far as we can glean, he is accused of setting up fake bombs. As far as I’ve been able to ascertain from available information, there weren’t any real or live explosives: it was a hoax.

According to his appearance before Westminster Magistrates Court in February, he left the canisters with wires at MOD Stafford on January 2nd: his aim being “inducing in another the belief the item was likely to explode or ignite”.

Why was he planting *fake* bombs?

Was he just an unstable type? Was he an over-the-top prankster? Did he have a vendetta of some kind that he was acting out? It could be any of those things, or something else besides.

Though, if I’m honest, planting fake explosives makes me wonder about possible false-flag implications. But that’s probably just me.

And where does the Official Secrets Act come into it? It appears to relate to Khalife having allegedly collected information, including from the Ministry of Defense, that would be ‘useful to the enemy’ or that would be of use to terrorists.

The BBC, in one report, implied a suspected link to Iran: but it didn’t provide any details or any substantial reason for this claim. That idea has since been repeated elsewhere too.

But an alleged family member claims Khalife only visited Iran twice – once when he was a baby and again when he was about seven. The relative is quoted as saying: “Danny doesn’t know Iran, he loves this country. Two years ago he was quite happy, he said he never wanted to leave the army – he said they were good people and then something happened last year. He was scared to talk about it and so he ran away. I don’t believe the allegations…”

There isn’t really a conclusion or thesis here. Other than that the whole case seems odd.

We’re obviously missing some information, which may or may not come to light in the future. Though if the 21 year old is charged under the Official Secrets Act, specific details of his crime might not be disclosed.

Khalife otherwise doesn’t come across as an especially strange 21 year old. Media coverage has shown him a lot posing for selfies. There’s been talk of him being a ‘joker’, some coverage about him being ‘vain’ and always looking in the mirror, etc. One claim by a fellow inmate says Khalife boasted that he would be ‘famous’ one day.

I’m not sure how seriously to take any of this media profiling of the subject.

There also doesn’t appear to be any obvious proclivity towards terrorism or extremism. According to a source quoted by the BBC, “One thing I will tell you though, he’s not a terrorist. He doesn’t know his arse from his elbow…”

Again, I’m not forwarding any theory here. Only highlighting that the story is odd, and that the general narrative so far is definitely missing some key information or context.

And again, given the nature of the Official Secrets Act, that information might never become public: in which case, this will just be one of those perplexing stories that crops up every now and then and eventually gets forgotten about.

It’s worth noting also that, at the Old Bailey in July, the former engineer for the Royal Signal Corps, pleaded not guilty: both to the terrorism charge and the Official Secrets Act charge.

If he was aiming at fame and notoriety (as some sources claimed), denying guilt seems paradoxical.

S. Awan

Independent journalist. Pariah. Believer in human rights, human dignity and liberty. Musician. Substandard Jedi. All-round failure. And future ghost.


  1. Curiousier and curiouser. Like you, I haven’t actually paid a great deal of attention to this story although I did just happen to be watching the MSM news as it broke. And the aspect that stood out immediately was how it instantly had made the headlines on ALL channels simultaneously. After I’d first remarked on this coincidence we even checked just to make sure. Another oddity was how ALL channels immediately began pointing accusatory fingers towards the government and specifically Justice Minister, Alex Chalk – at least, I seem to recall it was Chalk who was put in the frame although correct me if I’m wrong – it may have been another member of the cabinet because these guys are just so faceless I can’t tell them apart anymore!

    Well, call me suspicious-minded but when the entire media jumps onboard a somewhat quirky story: an almost farcical caper in fact, that concerned the prison escape of a young man with no history of actual violence – just a petty criminal with grand delusions if the official story is to be believed – who is suddenly being portrayed as a some kind of imminent danger to western civilisation, well it certainly does raise suspicions about what it’s really going on. Was it just a calculated distraction from events elsewhere? A bizarro assault on an increasingly hobbled government aimed at one member of the cabinet in particular? Or something else altogether?

    At the risk of sounding callous I have thought the same about quite a number of recent headline stories. I won’t name names becuse it would be insensitive, but a few of the stories of everyday individual tragedy – adults going missing – that then evolve into stranger tales altogether. Stories with threads or resolutions that seem improbable in the extreme, especially if you trace back to how they were first reported – when the details seemed more innocuous and you might have found yourself wondering: yes, this is very sad for the family, but why is it making the news? Then the subsequent revelations as gradually your jaw hits the floor.

    One very last point. Lone wolfs are always preferred when it comes to media attention. While a current vogue is all about the purported threat of violence from ‘incels’. Actual evidence is scant that most ‘incels’ – even those who self-identify as women-haters – do anything much besides playing computer games and writing obnoxious comments. Yet lonely, miserable guys have somehow become enemy number one. Of course, the national security state constantly needs to upgrade its enemies simply in order to heighten the strategy of tension. Keep us on our toes and always on the ready to suspect anyone displaying any form of abnormal behaviour. So perhaps this story was also a little reminder. Watch out, that guy who looks a little awkward, he might literally be terrorist, or worse…

    • Thanks James. That’s interesting, I wasn’t aware that a specific minister was being blamed. It’s definitely true that there are quite a few news items that seemingly serve little public interest value and seem geared towards distraction.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.