The RAF Fairford Incident is still veiled in mystery.
Five men were arrested in the early hours of Sunday morning after “three suspicious vehicles” were reported travelling towards the base. A local farmer alerted police to a “large group” of masked men near the vehicles.
They were arrested on suspicion of explosives offences and later on suspicion of preparing a terrorist act, before being released on bail on Monday.
Police said a quantity of petrol but no explosive devices were found during searches of vans near the site.
And then President Donald Trump strangely claimed that the detained men had already been under observation and were “looking to do big damage”. Trump later complained about them being released.
“We know everything about them,” he told reporters. “I would not have released them.”
For clarity, RAF Fairford is an American base, one of various US bases in the UK. And it would be a logical target, given it has been used to launch planes that have conducted foreign bombing operations, including in Iran.
But what did Trump mean with his statements? Why would he already ‘know everything about them’?
And if American government sources did already know everything about them, why did the police release the men? That doesn’t make any sense.
Under British terror laws, the authorities are allowed to hold terror suspects without charge for up to two weeks: so why were these men released so quickly, given the US president’s later statements?
And here’s the other thing worth noting: the Fairford Incident happened after Israel warned the British government that a precise plot of this type was about to unfold.
This is according to Benjamin Netanyahu himself, who told FOX News‘s Sean Hannity “We gave the Brits the intel, that there was going to be an attack, and it’s an Iranian-sponsored attack.”


I don’t get it. They’re not even trying any more. Who is this supposed to convince exactly? And that drone in Leipzig was equally daft and non-eventful. Nobody I know speaks about any of this except perhaps to ridicule the stupidity of the official narrative (which is mainly what I do). So was it a botched false flag? Plausible. To achieve what though? I mean let’s say this was a real attack on a US airbase. Well, the US is currently at war with Iran. So actually from a legal perspective, such an airbase is a legitimate target unlike, say, the girl’s school in Minab where US missiles murdered over a hundred children. So what would they have to do to regain public support in the UK? I honestly think it wouldn’t change opinion much if they burned it down. Those who currently support the illegal war (including the government) would continue supporting it – allowing further bombing raids to set off from the bases in the UK – and the rest of us would probably shrug our shoulders and say something like – that’s war.
So what I’m wondering is, what is the aim of these latest false flags? (Presuming it was one – and it has all the hallmarks.) Are they running out of ideas? Is the narrative out of their control? Or are they gearing up for something truly horrific? This is my lingering fear – at the back of my mind. What would a take? Something a hell of a lot more scary that a few guys with some diesel cans. I hope we never find out.