FRANCE, Bastille Day ‘Attack’: 100% Staged False-Flag – And Here’s Why…

Nice, Bastille Day, terrorist attack
The terrorist truck in the Nice attack. The Promenade des Anglais in Nice, France, July 15, 2016. REUTERS/Eric Gaillard - RTSI2HH

So, so sick of this BS.

And I know I’ve said that a number of times before, so let’s just get on with it. Let’s just expose this latest staged ‘terror attack’ nonsense quickly and be done with it – so that we can get on with our day.

And before I explain why this ‘truck attack’ in Nice is almost certainly a staged/false-flag operation, let me just get the disclaimer out of the way: our thoughts and sympathies should be with those killed, harmed or traumatised in this incident and I’m so sorry for anyone who has suffered.

Calling it a ‘false-flag’ isn’t the same thing as saying that no one really died or was hurt: it just means that the attack was organised by a different source to the lone-wolf perpetrator who we’re shortly going to be told all about.

Having said that, I’ve been looking at some of the videos the news channels have been playing over and over again – and none of it looks very convincing. You can check some of them out for yourselves; all I’m seeing is lots of people running around and shouting.


But I’m going to ignore that whole side of things anyway – because we actually don’t need to nitpick the footage or the accounts in order to explain why this was a false-flag operation: we can use pure, simple logic.

What’s sad is that it only took me about three minutes to work out that this was probably a false-flag event.

Why? Because I immediately remembered I’d read a piece on the BBC News website just *hours* earlier and it gave the game away completely.

The BBC reported in the afternoon of 14th July 2016; ‘France will not extend the state of emergency imposed after last year’s Islamist militant attacks in Paris in November beyond 26 July, President Francois Hollande has announced. The president said in his traditional Bastille Day interview that it would not make sense for the emergency to be extended indefinitely. That would mean the rule of law “no longer applied”, Mr Hollande said. France has twice extended the state of emergency since it was first imposed...’

So here’s the sad part: as soon as I switched on the news and saw the breaking report of the Nice attack, my first thought was ‘brilliant timing’.

And then when I tuned back in a couple of hours later and we were being told Francois Hollande was about to make a speech, I said to myself ‘He’s going to say they now need to extend the state of emergency for longer…’

True enough, that’s precisely what Hollande declared after the Nice attack.



Which makes this one of the most obvious, blatant inside jobs you could think of. The report that France was going to end the state of emergency was literally the SAME DAY as the attack that conveniently provided the basis for CONTINUING the state of emergency – literally just hours before it happened.

The French Deep State might as well have left a signed calling card at the scene.

Here’s another report that France was about to end the state of emergency, just in case you’re doubting it. Just Google ‘France to end state of emergency’ – there were about two dozen different news sources confirming it, all of them yesterday and just hours before the Nice attack.

For those unaware of it, the state of emergency was enforced after the 13th November attacks (also false-flags).

The emergency powers triggered by the November Paris attacks included the deployment of between 6,000 and 7,000 soldiers into public places, primarily to protect schools, synagogues, department stores and other sensitive sites, but essentially testing the waters (and laying the foundations) of a military/police state.

A recent commission had in fact found that the state of emergency was only having a “limited impact” on improving security – which this Nice attack (if it is real) seems to demonstrate.

Rights activists and civil liberties groups, as well as some politicians, in France have been opposing the emergency powers for some time, placing the state under pressure to justify the situation.

A Human Rights Watch article, dated April 20th 2016, was asking the question ‘Will France’s State of Emergency Ever End?’ It noted, ‘The state of emergency grants the government considerable powers to search homes without judicial warrants and impose control orders, designed to restrict the movement of people authorities consider a threat to public order or security, but who have been charged with, far less convicted of, nothing. In February 2016, Human Rights Watch documented abusive and discriminatory raids and control orders against Muslims in France executed under state-of-emergency powers. People described to us how police officers stormed into their homes in the middle of the night, broke their belongings, traumatized their children…’

 Paris terror attack, November 2015 

It continued, ‘As it seeks to extend these powers once again, the government should explain why it cannot ensure public order and safety with the wide range of laws and powers already at its disposal. The prospect of eight months of the state of emergency – with no commitment as to when it might end – raises the question of whether it could, in fact, become permanent.’

They also warned, ‘A further extension of these powers would also set a dangerous example to other countries that could use France as an example to justify their own endless restrictions on freedoms.’

Well, guess what? It’s ok, because the French state is now going to end the state of emergency and… oh, wait, what’s that? Oh, no, sorry – breaking news: state of emergency will continue because, see, we just had another terrorist attack!

It’s so badly plotted that you have to wonder if, in future, they could just do it all in one speech: literally, just have the President announcing the state of emergency is now over, and halfway through his speech he pauses and says ‘oh wait, I’ve just been informed there’s been another attack – sorry, folks’.

Because that’s basically what has just happened – all in one day.

Basic tip: whenever a terror attack happens, always check for what kind of legislation, police powers, surveillance powers, etc, have been discussed by politicians or in the media beforehand.

At the time of writing this, I’ve also been told by someone that the gunman/truck driver was known to the police – but I can’t verify that. I’ve also been told there’s video footage of motorcycled police guiding the truck driver to his target – but I haven’t been able to find it yet.

Someone has also said that entire area where the attack happened had been blocked off for the day’s event and in theory the truck shouldn’t have been able to even get there.

And I’m just hearing now that the driver/attacker’s ID has been found in the truck to identify him: and that the grenades and other weapons allegedly found in the truck are fake.


 Je Suis Sick of this Shit 

In the United States, September 11th 2001 – the Neo-Cons’ predicted and desired “Pearl Harbour” – established a “permanent state of emergency“ (the Patriot Act), allowing it to make radical changes domestically and also to launch several imperialist wars of aggression.

France’s state of emergency could be paving the way for France and Europe to follow/adopt, or perhaps more accurately to come into line with, the American model.

Moreover, Francois Holland has said previously that the French constitution may need to be altered in order to deal with this terrorist threat, as the country is being prepared for potentially draconian policies, including the possibility of expelling foreigners considered a threat. As far back as November and the state of emergency being declared, the president was openly seeking to expand his own powers and the powers of the state.

Some, even in France, see the dangers of this. “If you give the president powers that have been reserved practically for civil war, that is extremely serious,” said Adrienne Charmet some months ago, campaign director for a French digital-rights group, la Quadrature du Net.

We should note that the November Paris attacks also occurred only a few months after legislators passed sweeping new surveillance laws affording the government expanded powers to closely monitor the mobile phone and Internet communications of its citizens, including monitoring phone calls and emails without the authorization of a judge. The same law requires Internet service providers to retain and provide mass data on the Web-browsing and general Internet habits of millions of people to intelligence agencies.

All of this might be a very effective way of fighting terrorism and thwarting future attacks; but that’s assuming of course that there have been any genuine terrorist attacks.

Watch now and wait for all the usual BS; the sheer, inane predictability of everyone and everything in response. ‘Oh no, another terrible attack!’ ‘Something must be done about these awful Muslims!’ ‘Multi-Culturalism has failed!’ ‘It’s the refugees – deport them all!’ You can set your watch to all this bullshit.

Get ready for all the psy-op conditioning and the #PrayForNice or #PrayForFrance or #PrayForEurope hashtags, and all the mainstream news broadcasters spending the next few days asking ‘what can we do to increase our security and make sure this doesn’t happen again?’, accompanied by dramatic montages with sad music – it’s only been a few hours and I’ve seen both Sky News and RT  doing it already.

It’s called the script.



Related material: ‘Paris Attacks: Staged, False Flag Operation‘, ‘Paris Attacks: There Were NO Suicide Bombers‘, ‘Paris, City of ‘ISIS’: Mass Hypnosis Psy-Op Underway‘, ‘Bataclan Singer Confirms Staged, False-Flag Attack‘, ‘The Charlie Hebdo Fake Attack Exposed‘, ‘Brussels: Proofs of a Staged, False-Flag Operation‘, ‘7/7 London Bombings: What the Media Won’t Tell You‘…


S. Awan

Independent journalist. Pariah. Believer in human rights, human dignity and liberty. Musician. Substandard Jedi. All-round failure. And future ghost.


  1. Beyond disturbing. All the souls that perished all the permanently injured; all the families impacted. Further disturbing tidbits are, as u stated the timing of the event, public statements that the Fench need to get used to this culture of attacks, that vehicles blocking access were removed, a text by driver that more small arms were needed at “C” (camion?), that arms were replicas (was truck supposed to burst as a more insane finale to the evening’s celebration to the nation’s liberty that the attack would quash or was actice gunner driver supposed to exit vehicle with an AK he didnt know was fake and a heroic ending take place was he was put down by law enforcement? – who really knows?); then there’s the money the perpetrator sent back home ( a nice round figure [plus exchange.fees.or tithe] when crunched against certain currency exchange rates – which may point the finger directy towards foreign confederates).

    Thanks, another great post!! Movie of the day is Nick of Time.

    Interesting to note is that humanitarian and philantropist Bono was dining blocks the evening’w tragic events. The Irish Bono , whome I admire. is well familiar with the carnage from his own growing up in war torn Belfast will he write new Bastille lyrics of Thursday Bloody Thursday? He most certainly will, and possibly become outspoken on the subject.

    • Thanks for contributing; you raise an interesting thought that hadn’t occurred to me regarding the fake weapons and the possibility he might’ve thought they were real.

    • I haven’t had time to look into Baton Rouge yet. Are you saying it *was* a false-flag? If you post on it, I’ll be sure to check it out.

      • Thanks I appreciate that. I’m still investigating this incident myself. There’s some things about this that still don’t add up to me.

  2. I’m a truck driver and it’s obvious that the victims are actors. Having hit deer and other critters on the road there is often major damage to their bodies. One thing lacking in the ‘crime scene’ is evidence of a blood trail from the tires of the truck. Surely some of the ‘victims’ would have been crushed by the rear tire set. No victims appear crushed like roadkill. And I’ve yet to see a clear video showing people actually being struck. Also, all the bullet holes appear to have impacted the windshield at the same angle. No glancing impacts from angles beyond 90°. And none directly in front of the ‘drivers’ position on the left side. It always comes down to ‘who benefits’. Certainly not the Muslim or Christian communities. Maybe the killers of Semite Palestinians?

    • You seem fairly certain the victims were actors – I’ve chosen not to go down that road as I don’t want to offend anyone or belittle anyone’s personal loss or suffering. However, other people have suggested this too – and I defer to your perspective as a truck driver and I’m open to that possibility.
      It has certainly been done before – i.e, ‘crisis actors’ and staged scenes.

      • Drive across any stretch of roadway in a deer populated area and you will see evidence of what happens when one is hit. Not all deer will leave blood sign on the pavement but a good many will. With as many hit (killed or injured) in this event, there should be some blood sign besides the very bright red blood dribbling away from beneath the shown dead victims. And in this day and age of cell phone video there should be thousands of uploads of the event and aftermath. But we’ve moved onto the next big thing… a coup in Turkey, more shootings over here, etc. They appear all to be contrived hoaxes based on gematria.

  3. Reblogged this on Come In with an Open Mind! and commented:
    This is a great post! Some very useful information. Definitely worth a read!

  4. If you’re developing your theory around the state of emergency announcement, then you’re wrong. Sorry to be blunt, but I live in France, and it was declared way before the 14th that the state of emergency would be stopped on the 26th…

    • Yes, but he announced it on the 14th. And all of the media reported his announcement on the 14th.

    • With all respect, you may be missing the point Paul is making. Europe and it’s Western allies have a track record of timely incidents occurring all within a window of time that is convenient to legislation being discussed in their national assembies.

      In US the Patriot act was assured by blocking all opposition mail to Congress through ant-tracks attacks so that all mail to elected officials would need to be destroyed. The same type of events also hit outspoken major and indie media outlets so that opposition reporting was also strategically squelched. The ant-tracks was later genetically traced.to SeeEyeAy bio lab in Maryland. Spain and England saw similar timely tragic events. You can say it’s all coincidence or.you can open your eyes to the facts.

  5. But still not as spectacular as 9/11 hey? Trouble is ” Conspiracy Theorists” Just are never believed by the masses.no matter what ‘ Proof’ is put to them. Je Suie Nice. and all those innocent lives lost. As said ” So strange that this truck was allowed to crawl along for over a mile in a no – go area.” But I bet that Q. Will never be answered.

    • News reports i read say that truck was stopped and said he was delivering ice cream – at 10 or 11 at night. Problem is that even if driver was told not to continue and he did, the use of lethañ force against him had not yet been justified by patroñs on the ground.

  6. I think this may be a set up along the lines of the Dallas shooting. With real victims, but with a patsy to perform the killings and take the fall. The reason i believe this is that it has the hallmarks of a false flag (timing, id found, terrorist shot dead etc), but unlike many, the videos and images on social media are numerous and do appear to show genuine dead people in a manner that would be hard to fake.

    Check out the following link which shows some of the social media post immediatly after the event. In particular a video by PMLEGEND which is quite gruesome but very telling.


  7. They are promulgating a race war in the US: which will provide the pretext for them to declare martial law. And they are using false flag ‘Islamic’ terror to achieve the exact same result here in Europe.

  8. Doesn’t take long. Read James/Crimes report few hours ago, post some general half-wonderings why – but ambivalent about reality/or not of the event? Now a Peekay Truth video and what-have-you since – to conclude, this isn’t looking the sincere suffering presented. And now you quick on a call-out. As with James, well-done. In a few more hours, it’ll be clearer, or still mud and suspect. Best the word gets out prompt, pray some rightly-should, get on a search engine and find those like here, concerned and questioning.

    As you write, we can see the trajectory. The life-threatening route to collective imprisonment and lights out. You wonder why – assume the full-fake – they go this route and not the relative security of a false-flag to cover-up? It’s hardly going to be compassion for life that informed. Maybe comes back to potentially deeper/symbolic/ritual needs ( – a personal investigation). Or what..? The thrill of the bigger-ruse, or perhaps easier for wider numbers to participate? This one’s potentially wide-open for suspicions. If evidence to the contrary doesn’t emerge, there should be a whole lot of people carrying lies? It doesn’t take much to convince but as with all the other ‘events’, hardly encouragement masses are ready, to face (i.e. seriously consider) this present shocker of a world.

    Relate to your weary dismissal and while, not only the furthering in France but coordination wider – which you ably demonstrate – James reply to my comment on Crimes suggests; ‘It seems like they are working their way towards some sort of conclusion or climax…’ He’s not sure what but together with your commentary – keep these powers of darkness lit loudly for some up-rise.

    • Really don’t like to post a link/alone but under the circumstances, thought some might find – Bastille Day Terror in France – Real or Hoax? [LIVE COVERAGE] by John le Bon – helpful. Particularly heartening is the open-minded intelligent approach. My comment; ‘Responsible, honourable and excellent’. But like you rightly start with above, if there’s/assume causalities, we genuinely understand any loved ones involved, viewing this kind of investigation as the regrettable outcome of discovering evidential historical false-flags and – increasingly, full-hoaxes.

      • Nice one, Mark. Feel free to post any links that are relevant; so that people can broaden their sources.

    • Thanks Mark; yep, was intending to check out James’s site, as I knew he’d be onto it.
      I guarantee you that the majority of people won’t pay attention to any of this, but will get sucked into the usual sectarian, divide-and-conquer, us-versus-them propaganda.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.