Did Trump give Bill Clinton a blowjob?
I’m going to guess probably not.
But the fact that this question is even being asked says everything about the abject state of affairs that is now normal.
Ten years ago such a question would’ve been considered insane. Today, it’s not really that strange at all.
When people are legitimately asking whether the current President of the United States performed sexual acts on a former President (a former President who he supposedly hates as an arch enemy), it’s surely time to retire to bed.
We’ll talk about Steve Bannon, Peter Thiel and some other elements too here: but the Trump/Clinton thing – or ‘Bubba Gate’ – is just too hard to ignore.
The question isn’t based on nothing: one of the Epstein emails recently released literally has the deceased financier, intelligence asset and sex trafficker communicating with his brother about whether ‘Putin‘ has the images of Trump ‘blowing Bubba’.
In fact, more specifically he says to ask Steve Bannon if Putin has the material.
‘Bubba’ was famously a nickname for Bill Clinton.
Boy, Mark Epstein wasn’t joking when he said the 2016 election would’ve had to be cancelled if the truth about both sides was ever made public.
Mark Epstein has subsequently felt the need to state publicly that ‘Bubba’ doesn’t refer to Bill Clinton. But he doesn’t say who or what it does refer to.
And he of course doesn’t deny that the exchange was real.
Also, a video has circulated online appearing to show Trump touching up Clinton’s crotch area: but I assume this clip has been doctored by AI. I recognise the photos this footage is based on, but the clip itself is definitely fake.
Look, I doubt Trump pleasured Bill Clinton: but maybe it’s just because the mental image is so absurd that I can’t bring myself to entertain it. Or maybe I’m in denial – about how obscene this surreal Trump-centered collapse of reality has become.
I wrote here quite recently about the absurdity of Trump continuously trying to deflect attention off himself and on to Bill Clinton. As I said in that article, they were both deeply involved with Epstein and both aware of the other’s involvement.
So one of them constantly trying to implicate the other seems very silly.
I highlighted the ridiculousness of Trump parading sexual victims of Bill Clinton onstage during a 2016 presidential debate, as it was clearly an attempt to pin everything on Clinton and thus deflect attention away from himself.
But I hadn’t imagined even then that ‘Did Trump give Clinton a blowjob?’ would soon be an actual question being asked online and in earnest.
But no, let’s assume ‘Bubba’ refers to someone else. For our sanity, if nothing else.
That doesn’t make this exchange any less interesting.
What’s also interesting in this particular email is the reference to Putin possibly having the evidence.
I wrote here just recently about whether Putin does have kompromat on Trump, including relating to the Epstein stuff. If taken at face value, this email could be seen to reinforce that notion somewhat.
If so, is the email implying that Epstein made that kind of material available to Putin? Even that Steve Bannon would be the one to know if Putin had the pictures?
Or was the whole ‘Bubba’ thing completely separate from Epstein?
I’ve suggested before that Russia gate probably wasn’t a compete hoax, even if much of it was fabricated and the Democrats did a terrible job presenting a case. But the Democrats piss-poor job of it was, I previously argued, because they were desperate to avoid pointing at Israel so they pinned everything on Russia.
I also then have to wonder if this supports what I suggested previously: that a mixture of Israeli and Russian influence and manipulation helped Trump into the White House in 2016.
Epstein’s relationship with Russia is unclear: but there seems to be some suggestion of connections in Russia. Read this at Dossier Center, for example, concerning Epstein’s relationship with Russian Minister and FSB Academy graduate Sergei Belyakov, who he even introduced to Israeli leader Ehud Barak.
Also, Robert Maxwell (Ghislaine’s father, the media tycoon, super-spy and all-round Israeli hero) did work for the KGB, even as he was working for Mossad and MI6.
It’s amazing though that so much is raised by just this one very tiny email between Epstein and his brother: and there are thousands more such files. This one email is just a drop in that ocean.
We should also note that Steve Bannon’s relationship with Epstein is also under scrutiny. Email releases indicate that Epstein was in some cases acting as an assistant or organiser for Bannon’s political activities.
He was also advising the former Goldman Sachs man on how to build his international right-wing alliance (‘The Movement’), particularly in how to manipulate European politics.
A Byline Times article notes that ‘Epstein was engaged with Bannon’s efforts to build a pro-Trump European populist alliance… The exchange places Epstein within Bannon’s transatlantic political network a full year before the 2019 European elections, during a period when Bannon was seeking to build influence across nationalist movements in Italy, Hungary, France and the United Kingdom.’
Bannon and Epstein appear to have been in close contact right up until the very day of Epstein’s arrest in 2019. In fact, Bannon was making a film with Epstein on Epstein’s private island – and was particularly interested in helping rehabilitate Epstein’s public image.
And all this is just scratching the surface.
There are some 20,000 emails that have been made public. How many of these provide any meaningful information is unclear, but they’ll at least offer some insight.
The nature of the communications also doesn’t always make it clear what’s tongue-in-cheek and what’s serious. The email we focused on here, for example, could in theory be a jokey or sarcastic exchange about Trump ‘blowing Bubba’ or Putin maybe having the evidence.
Or it could be an insight into a genuine reality. It’s hard to know.
But the tone revealed in multiple document releases from recent months (Mandelson’s “yum yum” message or Trump’s reference to every day being a “wonderful secret”) suggest that at least some of those involved with Epstein were entirely aware of the sexual exploitation or actively involved in it.
Whether that would also apply to people like Noam Chomsky, Bill Gates, etc, is unclear. Not everyone who had a relationship with Epstein would’ve necessarily had any sexual element involved. As previously pointed out, Tony Blair might not have, for example.
But it does all show how widespread and interconnecting Epstein’s network was/is, penetrating into every aspect of political, financial and institutional power.
For example, Noor Jasmine put up a very good YouTube video here focusing on Epstein’s dealings in Saudi Arabia, particularly his proximity to Mohammad Bin Salman‘s purge of half the Saudi royals in 2016 (strangely just as Trump was assuming the US presidency). Epstein’s links with MBS and the Saudis isn’t something that gets discussed much.
We haven’t even got to the likes of Peter Thiel and Elon Musk yet. Thiel had considerable communications and meetings with Epstein, documents show. Epstein wrote to the Palantir founder in November 2018 to invite him to visit his private island. Elon Musk is also named in documents as having been due to visit the island.
Both Musk and Thiel insist the visits never actually took place.
And Larry Summers (Bill Clinton’s Treasury Secretary) has stepped away from both OpenAI and his Harvard teaching position in the wake of being exposed in the latest Epstein releases.
Seriously, how are the political, tech, financial and corporate elites ever going to get away from this stuff anymore? The Epstein/Maxwell spiderweb everywhere.
I said last week, in relation to the Epstein connections to Peter Mandelson, that ‘the connections are everywhere. Yet I suppose we should also remember that compromised individuals with dirty secrets running our politics isn’t new.’
Who isn’t tangled in this web? We’ve got presidents, foreign leaders, government ministers, heads of corporations and industries, royalty, celebrities.
How many of them are going to be genuinely exposed or humiliated? Or is Trump supposed to be the main fall guy, the main scapegoat? There’s no question that the Democrats have weaponised these documents to undermine Trump: but the fire behind the expanding smoke has always been in evidence.
However, Trump won’t go down without taking as many others with him as possible. And since the spiderweb is so huge, this is a strange and dangerous game. With or without a full disclosure of unredacted files, this is literally a collapse. All credibility has been lost. Irredeemably.
The establishment has been caught with its pants down. And that image is an understatement – I’m trying to be tasteful.
And the bare-faced grifters who once vowed to ‘drain the swamp’ are in fact some of the major swamp dwelling lifeforms themselves: Steve Bannon among them.
If it wasn’t all so disgusting, it really would be the basis for a comedy.
President Trump has now allowed for a full release of all Epstein files, though a date hasn’t been given.
How much of that supposed release will be carefully edited or redacted, we don’t know. How much impact it will have, or be allowed to have, we’ll have to wait and see.
Coming back to the ‘Bubba’ thing. Was this really a reference to Trump and Bill Clinton? I’m still saying probably not.
But honestly, who knows anymore? The late Virginia Giuffre (who, remember, was acquired by Ghislaine Maxwell at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort) alleged that, in some cases, some of Epstein’s elite clients engaged in communal orgy-like events.
If so, who can know for sure what kind of seemingly absurd things happened? There are other theories floating around about who or what ‘Bubba’ could be: including that it could be a horse belonging to Ghislaine Maxwell!
What’s supremely ironic is how much was made of a few references to ‘pizza’ in Hillary Clinton’s emails back in 2016. An entire movement was created from the hysteria of ‘pizza-gate’ – with endless talk of the Satanic Democrat pedophile conspiracy, with Trump and his White Hats as the saviours coming in to fight this great evil.
It was in fact the primary basis for the Q-Anon garbage. It seems even more pathetic now than it did back then.
I’m also starting to wonder if this whole Epstein thing is acting like a useful scapegoat to keep attention away from other similar operations.
In other words, we should probably assume that the Epstein/Maxwell operation wasn’t the only operation of its type. But if all the hype, attention and revelations are purely centered on the Epstein activities, then no one is thinking about other, comparable networks that are probably still continuing.
Because I highly doubt that the industrial sex trafficking and blackmail operations have suddenly stopped.
