Hey, have you seen the footage?! Jeffrey Epstein is alive! Here he is, filmed in Israel!
Yes, this clearly AI-generated imagery is apparently all the proof some people needed.
I covered the January 30th Epstein Files drop at length and more seriously here recently: so I’ll avoid going back over any of those same elements again here or of specific documents and implications.
But observing the ongoing fallout from the flood of files has in some instances become a Theater of the Absurd.
From increasingly unhinged Alex Jones claiming it’s China, the Muslims and King Charles that are really behind everything, to Pam Bondi‘s abysmal performance before Congress, dubious reactions and bad takes have been common. We’ll get to Alexander Dugin too. And to ‘Baal’ and the allegations of Satanism, which are important to talk about.
But why does anyone think Jeffrey Epstein or his people would be so dumb as to walk around openly in Israel and allow him to be filmed? Wouldn’t that undermine the whole point of a faked death?
And it just so happened to be at precisely the moment that the DoJ’s massive document drop was dominating world news. That makes sense, right? Everyone’s talking about me, so now’s the moment to come out in public and be seen?
I actually don’t have any trouble believing Epstein might be alive or even in Israel: but he wouldn’t be flexing on the streets with a Hebrew posse, like some rap star on his way to the club.
On the other hand, questions about the video of a supposed Ghislaine Maxwell pointlessly pleading the fifth might have some merit. I mean, maybe?
Specifically, a lot of observers don’t believe that’s the real Ghislaine Maxwell in that video, which was made public on February 10th.
It’s possible she’s aged particularly noticeably in the last couple of years since her arrest: but underlying facial features tend not to change. And, as some have noted, her face seems to be different.
In particular, her nose and chin seem to be the wrong shape.
Is this a body double? Is it more AI generated imagery? It could be. Or maybe I’m going a bit crazy.
I think we all might be going crazy at this point. I think the whole ‘Epstein Files’ saga has created a psychosis.
Then you have the ‘Lady Victoria Hervey‘ insisting that Epstein himself is not dead. The bizarre and indefensible Hervey appeared on Piers Morgan’s show and called all the Epstein accusers prostitutes who were not trafficked. Continuing to defend her ex-lover Andrew Mountbatten, she also maintains that the famous photo of Andrew with Ghislaine and a young Virginia Giuffre is a fake (which Maxwell herself has also previously claimed).
Not that this is a person we should be taking seriously at any time. This is the same aristocrat and elite socialite who wouldn’t stop attacking Giuffre, and who strangely claimed – right before Giuffre’s death last year – that the FBI was hunting Giuffre. What she based that on, I still have no idea.
But you have to wonder what someone like Hervey is playing at: is she just an unhinged individual or is she running a kind of narrative interference on purpose?
Interestingly, a recent Canary article covers allegations that Hervey has been far more involved than has been widely understood. As it tells us; ‘in a frantic email to Giuffre’s lawyer David Boies last year, a redacted whistleblower correspondent accused… Hervey of running a ”serious gang of coordinated stalkers” to doxx and pursue them…’
‘Them’ in this context refers to abuse survivors and whistleblowers. They also refer to a specific Epstein file that ‘shows Hervey being accused publicly of being an “MI6 honeypot operative” close to Trump’s FBI director Kash Patel…’
An image is shown of Hervey with Patel and wearing a MAGA cap. Hervey is also alleged to have had regular contact with Ghislaine Maxwell while she’s been in prison.
Certainly, these descriptions of Hervey as someone tasked with harassing and trying to discredit victims and whistleblowers fit perfectly with her known attacks against the late Virginia Giuffre (which I had been trying to make sense of previously).
Yes, these people are that disgusting.
Here’s the full Piers Morgan interview. She also claims in this same interview to be in regular contact with the Metropolitan Police “on WhatsApp“. Whatever that means.
In an equally ill-advised TV appearance, Alan Dershowitz (also accused by some victims, including Sarah Ransome and Maria Farmer, of sexual abuses) also appeared on Morgan’s show and claimed it was virtually impossible that his friend and client Epstein had worked for Mossad or any intelligence agency.
This being despite Alex Acosta having already stated Epstein’s intelligence agency affiliations as far back as 2008 (and citing it as the very reason Epstein had been afforded such a lenient sentence).
For Dershowitz, as part of Epstein’s legal team in that very trial, it’s obviously impossible for him not have been aware of that.
Anyhow, Dershowitz was sure to denounce Epstein as a terrible “S.O.B” who did horrible things.
None of these people are fooling anyone anymore. But everyone’s in damage control mode: and it would almost be entertaining, if the underlying accusations weren’t so serious and the reality so dark.
Equally brilliant is Donald Trump being asked about the arrest of former Prince Andrew by British police: and taking the opportunity to again repeat his new mantra of “I’ve been exonerated, totally exonerated!”
Some of the apparent shock over Andrew’s fondness for “inappropriate friends” (his own words, from an email to Ghislaine Maxwell) has seemed a little performative, given the royal family’s history. Andrew’s uncle, Lord Mountbatten was strongly implicated in the Kincora boys scandal in Northern Ireland: an organised and widespread child abuse ring that may have been facilitated by MI5 and the security/intelligence services. Kit Klarenberg wrote an interesting article on this subject at the Grayzone a few weeks ago.
And Jimmy Saville’s uncommon closeness to the royals also raised questions, as pointed out before.
Meanwhile, the identity of the previously redacted ‘torture video’ correspondent of Epstein’s has been exposed as being Emirati big-shot Sultan Bin Sulayem.
I’m going to talk about Sulayem in a separate article on the Epstein/U.A.E relationship, so I’ll leave that there for now. But it was probably Sulayem who helped Epstein acquire that previously mentioned material from the Kaaba in Mecca – which is still one of the oddest details to have emerged in recent weeks.
Epstein allegedly used the cloth as a rug – which is no doubt being seen as rather offensive to devout Muslims. When I first heard of the bizarre Kaaba cloth acquisition, I’d considered perhaps Epstein sought it for spiritual or ritualistic purposes: for example, maybe something to do with the material’s perceived energy imprint or symbolic value.
But no, apparently he just used it as a rug. Which I assume makes Sulayem and co’s providing of this material to the financier even more outrageous to most Muslims now reading about it.
It’s not as if Sulayem, who exchanged numerous lewd messages with Epstein and also acquired women (prostitutes or trafficked sex slaves – it’s unclear), via that connection, would’ve expected someone like Epstein to have wholesome reasons for wanting material otherwise meant for Islam’s holiest object of devotion.
But as we’re on the subject of religion here, we might as well talk about ‘Baal’.
Some have really run with the whole Baal thing and chosen to focus on the idea that Epstein and his elite contacts were all about the Satanic rituals and occult practises.
Which, you know, may or may not have some truth to it, as such things are fairly well established at this point. But I don’t know that there’s much evidence for that stuff in the specific documents that have been released.
The sole Baal reference in the emails has been misinterpreted: the document doesn’t say that his J.P Morgan bank account was named ‘Baal’, as is being claimed. And the appearance of the word has been put down to a scanning error. The error appears to be explained here.
So, again, people running with that element as their main thesis for what Epstein and co were up to might be off the mark: and are mostly pushing the occult/Satanist angle primarily only to reinforce evangelical Christianity (or the Abrahamic faiths) as the only antidote. I’ll come back to this shortly.
Muslims have seized on it too, however. And in several Iranian cities, effigies supposedly of Baal were being set alight in denouncement of and opposition to the West’s perceived Satanic elites.
We’ve reached a really strange place.
Meanwhile some mainstream media voices have started rethinking their position on things like Pizzagate, even going so far as to pose questions like ‘Was Q-anon Right All Along?’
What a turnaround. While the validity of the Pizzagate conspiracy is justifiably being reconsidered in light of several Epstein emails (as previously discussed here), Q-anon was still a psy-op – which is also possibly reinforced by the possible Epstein/4Chan connection (again, discussed here).
Still, corporate media having to so frequently acknowledge the validity of some of those pesky conspiracy theorists they’d previously dismissed and condemned is always edifying.
There’s a lot of backtracking going on. And a lot of people looking like rabbits caught in headlights.
But some of the more questionable takes on the Epstein emails make me again wonder if this whole process really had psy-op properties to it by design.
I said in the previous article that, ‘It’s also a case of ‘flooding the zone’: overwhelming the public with an avalanche of data, innuendo and unverifiable claims, to keep them occupied. The benefit of releasing all of these files in one massive dump is that it makes it extremely difficult for people to comb through or get to grips with. There’s simply too many documents, too much information, too many implications…’
One has to wonder if this whole thing and the manner of the process was a giant act of epic trolling – albeit coupled to a necessary release of files that was genuinely mandated.
That’s the impression you get when you watch the by-now comical Pam Bondi repeatedly gaslighting members of Congress and failing to answer any pertinent questions about the DoJ’s handling of the files or the lack of legal action being pursued against any criminally implicated individuals.
The fact that she could be so cavalier and arrogant when concerning things as serious as organised sexual abuse of minors, human trafficking and even allegations of murders, demonstrates the degree of rot on display.
In terms of psychological warfare, this whole thing could also be a demoralisation campaign against the general public. I wouldn’t put it passed them to do that.
Again, we’ve reached a really strange place.
Which is not surprising, given the scale of the depravity and corruption the Epstein files and the entire Epstein saga have laid bare: and given how much information people are trying to process or contextualise.
There are also bad actors online who’ve deliberately pushed fake claims or purposeful exaggerations. Which really shouldn’t be necessary, as the real stuff is bad enough.
In terms of the Satanism thing, and particularly the Baal angle, I tend to wonder if we’re missing the point.
What the Epstein saga illustrates is the criminality and corruption deliberately built into a system of control, manipulation and influence among the elites in high finance, intelligence, politics and academia. But it’s a mostly pragmatic system with tangible aims.
You don’t have to be a Baal worshipper to do evil things or be engaged in that corrupt system. There are plenty of evil people and corrupt operations in the world that have nothing to do with ancient Phoenician deities or with dedications to Satan.
Also, side-note, but it’s possible that Baal has gotten some bad press over the years. Primarily associated with the Phoenicians and the Biblical Canaanites, ‘Baal’, and the variations thereof, was a fairly standard deity among others: a god of storms, fertility and agriculture.
The Abrahamic traditions have over time cast Baal as equivalent to Satan, a false god or an adversary to the Biblical God. The term ‘Baal’ possibly being the root of ‘Beelzebub’ also explains the association with the Devil: but the evolution of both the etymology and the general portrayal is a bit nebulous.
There’s even some belief among some scholars that the Biblical Yahweh was at one point referred to as ‘Baal’ too.
Which is just to illustrate how messy and unclear all this stuff can be. I’m not advocating for Baal here or anything: just saying that this seems like a distraction from some of the much more significant and tangible things the documents have illustrated.
All of that being said, occult or what we’d regard as ‘Satanic’ rituals and undercurrents have been well attested to be present in high-level groups and activities, especially involving sexual and mental abuse of victims. The sheer number and persistence of individuals claiming to have witnessed or been victims of such rituals and practices over many years is impossible to ignore.
That stuff is real. I’m just not sure it’s all that present in the released Epstein files necessarily – even though there have been previous hints of some occult undercurrents or trappings with Epstein too.
And also I think a lot of people are overstating the Satanic aspect right now for religious or propagandistic reasons rather than to establish a clear picture.
Enter Mr Dugin.
Sticking with the ‘Satanic elites’ theme, while effigies of Baal were apparently being burnt in Iran, Russian propaganda maestro and supposed Putin whisperer Alexander Dugin was also keen to emphasise the Satanic dimension to all of this and has said the Epstein files precede the final “collapse of the West”.
Here’s a taste of his recent ramblings: ‘This is a collapse, a genuine downfall of the entire Western world… There are Satanists everywhere. One cannot even say where there are more: cannibals in one movement, cannibals in the other… Now it turns out that for so long we have been dealing with a most severe, monstrous Satanic civilization of the Antichrist, ruled by cannibals…’
He also referenced the Baal bank account, naturally.
The apocalypse fantasist Dugin of course says these things as if Russia is entirely clean in this web and that scores of Russian women haven’t been trafficked as part of the Epstein business.
Worth remembering that Dugin is also himself thought to be a Crowleyite occultist and possible satanist fond of black masses and other rituals: so why some gullible acolytes in the West continue to treat him as a credible voice is baffling.
Also, it is of course in Russian interests to portray the West as being run by Satanic paedophiles, with Russia cast as the more wholesome good guys. That’s precisely how Dugin and co have framed it: Russia is fighting a ‘holy war’ against the Satanist-addled West.
Curiously, he also later says: ‘Therefore, I think conspiracy theories, in the larger sense, have to stop here.” He adds that “we should move from conspiracy theories to theology, to religious doctrine. Because it all began with the moment we discarded the Church…”
Yeah. So again, this is what I was saying about the Satanism angle being emphasised mostly for political and religious reasons. It isn’t honest; it’s agenda based. Simply anther mode of manipulation.
Even so, he might at least have some semblance of a point concerning collapse. If not an actual material collapse of the Western order, then certainly both a reputational collapse and an irrecoverable crisis of image, coupled with a total loss of public faith in institutions: which was already discussed in the previous article on the Epstein Files.
Where do you go from there?
Maybe it’s time for that alien invasion to be staged. 2026 could be the year.
The drone tech is already all in place, and those UAP hearings in Congress have been setting the stage for a couple of years now.
If ever a massive distraction and/or redirection were needed, it’s probably now. So yeah… bring the ET’s in.
Let’s just get on with it, I guess.
VIP Child-Abuse Networks & the Potential Collapse of the State…
